Friday, May 31, 2019

societhf Values of Society :: Adventures Huckleberry Huck Finn Essays

Huckleberry Finn Values of Society   Often in satire, writers will use the internal conflict of a face to symbolically criticize the values and morality of society. In the novel The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, Mark two uses the main character of Huckleberry Finn and the conflict between his personality and social moral sense to criticize society. In this clash between his deformed conscience and sound heart, his heart is victorious. This conflict reflects the major themes within this work of slavery, racism, and civilized society. With a perfect(a) examination of this conflict and insight into these facets of Huck these facts become apparent to the reader.   It is clear that throughout The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, Huck is a character bearing a deformed conscious. Hucks misshapen sense of morals is a direct result of his dysfunctional upbringing. To better understand this let us first examine the background of Huck that Twain gives the reader. The Widow Douglas she took me for her son (1). An insightful reader can see from this that Huck is not receiving a mainstream childhood. Hucks father is a drunk, his mother is dead, and he is forced to sleep together with a widowed woman and her self-righteous sister. Given such conditions it easy to see why Huck rejects the morals of a society that has rejected him in the sense that he is not protected from his father. Hucks distorted sense of morals is also a product of selectively accepting precepts that have been instilled into him based on his own intelligence. In a humorous passage Huck describes his feelings towards religion. Then she Miss Watson told me all about the bad place hell, and I said I wished I was there...all I wanted was a change (2). Clearly Huck misunderstands the tenants of Christianity yet his motives were not malicious. Huck was merely expressing his desire to free himself of his current situation. He sees beyond the values of a hypocritical societ y and chooses to follow his own path. These misunderstandings of, and weak feelings of responsibility toward his faith have a distorted impact on his conscience. In variance to the religious beliefs of Miss Watson are the morals of his father.

Thursday, May 30, 2019

Can Ethical Terms Be Defined? :: Philosophy Philosophical Papers

Can Ethical Terms Be Defined? The answer cleverness seem obvious. Ethical terms can be defined because they have been. Good means diversion good means utility good means self-realisation, or self interest and so on. genuine moral philosophy philosophers have apparently had no difficulty at all in defning terms like good. It was just this multitude of contrastive and incompatible definitions however, which led Moore to have some doubts about whether philosophers knew what they were doing when they attempted to define good. Is it really possible to define good as one might define trilateral or horse? Are there not some important differences? Moore is convinced that there are. In the first place, when we define triangle or horse we know what we are defining in the sense that we can see or at least formulate an empirical authority of what we are talking about. We arent able to see goodness, or point to it, at least in the same way. Furthermore when we define triangle as an enclose three sided plane figure, it makes no sense to ask, but is an enclosed three sided plane figure a triangle? not at least if we know what we are talking about, i.e. a triangle. But if we define good as pleasure for instance, it does seem to make sense to ask but is pleasure (really or always) good? Moore is convinced that it makes sense to ask this question, not merely because we may happen to be ignorant of what goodness is, and have thus do a mistake such as would be the case if we defined a triangle as a four sided figure rather the mistake occurs because we have confused two quite different kinds of things with one another. We have confused a natural property (pleasure) with a non natural property (good). He calls this kind of error a naturalistic fallacy. Since it is bound to occur whenever we attempt to identify good with something that isnt, all purported definitions of good commit this fallacy. Good he concludes is unnameable This does not mean however that the term goo d is meaningless. On the contrary it is no more meaningless than the term yellow which is also indefinable in the requisite sense. Still the question remains. What does good then refer to ? Certainly not to any sensed property like yellow. It refers, according to Moore, to an intuited and unanalysiable property of goodness which some things have and others do not have.

Wednesday, May 29, 2019

The Character of Teiresias in Oedipus The King :: Oedipus Rex, Sophocles

Throughout history there have been some awful Greek plays. Some plays were more comedic in nature, so were romance plays and then there were some that were tragic plays. One of the greatest Greek tragedy plays ever so written was Oedipus the King.Brilliantly conceived and written, Oedipus the King dramatizes the self-discovery and tragic downfall of Oedipus, the King of Thebes. It tells the story about a young Greek who was fated to murder his father, marry his mother, and in the process become the King of Thebes, before ultimately meeting his downfall due to his own deeds. That makes this play so fascinating is that there are many underlying themes within the story, and I will attempt to shed light on one of these themes, that being the melodramatic irony of blindness. I shall do this by focusing on the words and actions of a minor character in the play, Tiresias.A minor character is a character that is developed in such(prenominal) a way to help reveal themes and depict certain literary devices. Literary devices are used in mostly all literary works, as they can help reveal pertinent information and also move the story along. In the play Oedipus Rex by Sophocles, the minor character of Teiresias is responsible for prefiguration Oedipus fate, developing the theme of blindness, and also illustrating dramatic irony. Teiresias uses his fortune teller abilities to foreshadow the anguish and destruction that Oedipus will encounter after he learns the truths of his life. Teiresias is also responsible for further developing the theme of blindness by using his own physical blindness to reveal to Oedipus his mental blindness. Lastly, Teiresias is ultimately responsible for imposing dramatic irony because of his great knowledge of the truth of Oedipus. In Sophocles Oedipus Rex, the character of Teiresias is developed in such a way that he utilizes many dramatic devices in order to reveal information and move the play along.As a fortune teller, Teiresias is able to see the fate and destruction of Oedipus life. Teiresias uses his great ability to reveal to the lector the downfalls in Oedipus life that will soon occur because of his quest to know his fate. The character of Teiresias demonstrates the use of foreshadowing in order for the reader to be conscious(predicate) of Oedipus fate.You can not see the wretchedness of your life, Nor in whose house you live, no, nor with whom.